|
Pearson v Wynn (1986) 2 NZCPR 449 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the requirement under section 7(4)(b) of the Contractual Remedies Act 1970 that a breach of a contract must be "substantial" for a contract to be cancelled. ==Background== Pearson sold to Wynn his horticultural land for $159,000. Prior to the sale, Pearson had misrepresented that the land was fully irrigated, when in fact that the irrigation system need a further $9,500 to $10,000 spent on it. When this came to the notice of Wynn, he cancelled the contract. Pearson sued to have the contract honoured. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Pearson v Wynn」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|